For camera-ready pictures
of Kristie, click here.


 
  
 
 
Archives
Kristie's Law introduced in Legislature
By LARRY MITCHELL 
Chico Enterprise-Record Staff Writer
February 2004 -- Police in California would only be able to chase drivers who pose an immediate risk of hurting or killing someone, if a bill introduced Friday by State Sen. Sam Aanestad, R-Grass Valley, becomes law. Senate Bill 1866 (renumbered 1403) would prohibit pursuing motorists who flee after police try to stop them for such things as traffic violations and auto theft. Aanestad said his bill aims to reduce the threat to innocent bystanders of police pursuits something he called a major problem in California and around the state.
 
In pursuit of citizens' safety
Senator Sam Aanestad sets up "Kristie's Law"
By LARRY MITCHELL 
Chico Enterprise-Record Staff Writer
January 13, 2004 -- State Sen. Sam Aanestad has released a draft version of "Kristie's Law," a bill setting minimum statewide standards for police pursuits. The bill aims to minimize the public dangers of police chases by limiting pursuits to cases that present "imminent peril" of injury or loss of life. If the bill became law in its present form, the practice of police in California chasing suspects for such things as minor traffic violations, speeding, or car theft would end, according to Brett Michelin, chief of staff to Aanestad, a Grass Valley Republican, whose district includes Butte County.  Click here for more of the story in the Chico Enterprise-Record

Our families deserve safer police pursuits
Innocent people caught in the middle of pursuits realize the individuals who flee are lawbreakers and need to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. However, the actions of police should never create an enhanced level of danger to the surrounding public or to the officers themselves. Of course, the criminals need to be caught ...but in a safer way. A car -- even a police car -- racing through our streets is equivalent to a 4,000 pound missile. Victims advocate groups believe peace officers, in many instances, can catch the "bad guys" in another way ... a much safer way without putting themselves or the public in imminent peril. Well-defined pursuit policies must be followed, and peace officers must always put public safety first, weighing the risk of the crime against the risk of the pursuit to the surrounding public.
 
 
Excerpt from Pursuing Justice
Many law enforcement officials and law enforcement lobbyists argue that chasing and catching the "bad guys" keeps the general public safe.  Not 100 percent true.  Only 10 percent of all pursuits involve violent felons who put the public in imminent peril ... leaving 90 percent for traffic offenses, misdemeanors, and non-violent crimes that pose little or no threat to the public unless pushed into fleeing, says Dr. Geoffrey Alpert, chair, department of criminology and criminal justice, University of South Carolina.
 
The public may also believe this 90 percent is now behind bars. Not so.  In many states, these suspects are back on the streets within hours or days.  In the Priano's case, the suspect went home with her mother.

Law enforcement lobbyists repeatedly say, "We need to pursue because the fleeing person will go on to commit horrific crimes."  Our legislators need to ask law enforcement lobbyists for evidence of this outcome. The following information is real evidence that more and more innocent people are being killed and maimed in California pursuits: 

Is it not horrific for a community to lose four innocent people in a pursuit in a Stockton school zone? The last bell rang and high school students were heading home. As planned a mother picked up three high school girls -- her two daughters and a family friend. They never made it home; they never made it out of the school zone. They were hit by an 18-year-old fleeing from police in a stolen truck. Click here for more of the story.

Is it not horrific that a newlywed is now a widow and must bury her husband, a Fresno County Sheriff Deputy? An innocent bystander, this deputy was not involved in the pursuit. Nevertheless, he lost his life over a stolen truck.  Click here for more of the story.

Is it not horrific that an innocent 15-year-old community volunteer in Chico is killed and then for her parents to learn that not one of the girls in the suspect's car was taken into physical custody on the night of that pursuit?  In fact, the driver was not taken into physical custody for 23 days ... and then to receive only one year in juvenile hall.  Click here for more of the story.

Is it not horrific to learn that two teenage girls were walking home from their San Diego school, only to be killed as a car fleeing from police rides the sidewalk?

Is it not horrific that a 4-year-old girl was killed instantly as she held her mother's hand while waiting for a bus?  And, in another pursuit in Ventura County an 18-year-old woman is killed as a CHP officer hits the car in which she is a passenger? She and her date were on their way home from a Senior Ball.  Click here for more of the story.

Sadly, very sadly, this list could go on and on because California leads the nation in the number of innocent people killed in police pursuits. In many cases, the suspects being chased could have been caught in a different way ... a much safer way.

Top

     
Something to think about . . .

  • Which scenario is safer?  An unlicensed driver on the road?  An unlicensed driver on the road fleeing police, now driving recklessly and at a high rate of speed?

  • Which is more valuable?  A stolen vehicle?  A human life?

  • What makes sense?  A pursuit law that puts Public Safety First.


What went wrong in Stockton?
"I helped pull the three girls out .... They were just little high schoolers."
                                         -- Frank Evans, witness to a preventable tragedy
 
"Even calling it an 'accident' evokes a negative reaction of the way Desiree died (i.e. police pursuit)."
                                         -- Ron and Adell Guzman, parents of Desiree, age 14
 
Let's stop dangerous and unnecessary pursuits
before another family has to suffer through this preventable tragedy. 


Here's how you can help!

California State Senator Sam Aanestad moves "Kristie's Bill" forward

By LARRY MITCHELL 
Chico Enterprise-Record Staff Writer

January 30, 2003 -- Senator Sam Aanestad said he will introduce legislation aimed at reducing the dangers of police pursuits.  Mark and Candy Priano met January 29.2003, with Aanestad, a Republican from Grass Valley who represents Butte County.  Aanestad told them he'd reserved a spot for a bill. Click here for more of the story.

 

TOP


Have questions or comments about this web site?
Send mail to kristies-law@sbcglobal.net.

©2003, 2004 kristieslaw.org